The US Military has confirmed that a Plasma ring forms in a bullseye – RING shape when targeted high frequency radio waves cross each other while hitting the upper atmosphere.
Experiments were done using HAARP to produce plasma rings, and super heating in the atmosphere.
The attached diagram is from the DTIC military .mil government site.
People said that the rings we were seeing appear across multiple systems were glitches, Birds and Bugs, Bats, and Background Clutter (just to name a few of the debunked excuses people tried to give over the years).
People came to my pages, professionals took to the media, forums were created against me, all saying it was impossible for radio waves to cause heating, or to create plasma rings. Many people called me a conspiracy theorist for saying HAARP rings were being generated by pulses of Radio Frequency.
Now we come to find out they actually have used HAARP to make (and study) the superheated plasma rings which form when High power radio transmissions are crossed, and targeted at the upper atmosphere.
[scribd id=303202797 key=key-HoPfZzE8l613rm3G4Qou mode=scroll]
We call the area where the beams cross a “SCALAR”. The SCALAR being the area which is manipulated by the radio waves.
A few RADAR pulse / HAARP ring plasma heating examples as observed from multiple weather RADAR systems.
The RADAR is observing the reflective plasma rings that it is creating ITSELF!
So, I guess I was just a few years ahead of my time.
Trying to explain plasma physics to deniers who were saying it could not be done … people calling me names and making fun of me for researching the topic??!!
Nevermind the HUNDREDS of previous times this has happened.
Now we come to find out that the people who denied the possibility, really just don’t understand plasma physics very much.
Here are a few past videos I’ve made on the subject of weather modification, plasma generation, heating using RF :
This video below shows that the US Navy created a multiple KM wide plasma sphere (ring) in the Atmosphere, and sustained it for over an hour using low MHz High Frequency transmissions from HAARP.
Observations of the ring were done using Microwave RADAR to watch the ring / 3D sphere shaped plasma form. Proof that RADAR is the way to observe the rings in question.
Our common NEXRAD weather RADAR pulses are done in the single MHz band as well. As it turns out these pulses from NEXRAD RADAR actually match HAARP rings in appearance and in radio bands: (NEXRAD actually pulses in the low MHz band, but normally operates in the GHz microwave band).
Microwave (and HF) transmissions can induce actual wind rotation above the transmitter:
High power transmissions (lasers and HPM) can induce CCN formation, Cloud Condensation Nuclei – water droplets which form into clouds, and precipitation.
Using Dual beams, one transmission can strip electrons, forming super heated plasma, while the other beam then “pumps up” and “sustains” the plasma .
Real life example of a RADAR pulse (HAARP ring from a RADAR station) done during a storm… plasma heating of Hurricane Irene.
Deniers at the time FIRST tried to say this was me photoshopping the feeds somehow. Deniers then backtracked on the photoshop claim, and instead changed their denials to say this was a “glitch”. After we provided multiple other instances reaching back through the year, the deniers then backtracked further and said it was a normal “switch” between clear air mode and precipitation mode on RADAR?
After we proved it was not a normal switch between RADAR modes, the deniers then tried to say we were seeing “Birds, Bugs, and Bats”. 🙂
Now we know, the ring shape is plasma forming in the upper atmosphere due to High Frequency (and microwave?) pulses of radio waves.
The plasma causes heating, and wind rotation, as well as CCN (cloud condensation nuclei water droplets) to form in addition to the electron cascade (precursor to lightning).
In other words, summed up, everything I found (and made public) about Radio Frequency induced plasma rings is proved correct, and everyone who said it was “impossible” is now proved wrong.